Author: CPAuthor

  • A Relational God: Why Process Philosophy Demands a New Theology

    In our first installment, we established the radical metaphysical premise of Process Philosophy: pretty much everyone assumes the world is made up of enduring objects, and that these objects are fundamentally real. However, in the system developed by Alfred North Whitehead, objects are not the final real things. Instead, it is the momentary, perishing units called Actual Occasions that possess ultimate reality. Everything we commonly think of as being a stable object—from a mountain to a human mind—is viewed as a Society of these actual occasions. This fundamental shift from a static world of substances to a dynamic world of events and becoming has profound implications, nowhere more so than in theology, where the nature of God must be reimagined from the ground up.


    The first point of divergence is the most shocking: Process Theology fundamentally rejects the traditional, static conception of God, especially as held in much of Evangelical and classical theology. The traditional God is defined by immutability (He cannot change) and omnipotence (He has absolute, total power over every event). But if the universe is truly dynamic, then God cannot be an exception. This is because Process Philosophy entails a form of panexperientialism: every fundamental unit of reality, the Actual Occasion, is a momentary drop of experience, and all objects are Societies of these experiencing occasions. This means a human is a complex, hierarchical organization—a multitude of societies (atoms, cells, molecules) all coordinating under a Dominant Nexus (the mind). If reality itself is made of experience, then the ultimate Actual Entity, God, must also be a being who changes, experiences, and participates in the world. This means the Process God is not a fixed King ruling from outside of time, but a relational companion who literally feels the joy and suffering of every moment in the universe.


    To fully grasp this revolution, it helps to understand the theologian behind it. Alfred North Whitehead was deeply rooted in the Christian tradition. His father was an Anglican pastor, and while Whitehead’s own faith evolved dramatically throughout his life, he consistently identified as a Christian who took religious belief seriously. However, as one of the great mathematicians and philosophers of science of his era (co-authoring Principia Mathematica with Bertrand Russell), he concluded that the traditional Christian concept of God—derived from Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover and formalized as the unchanging, transcendent Substance—was metaphysically incoherent and entirely incompatible with modern physics. The universe, as described by Quantum Mechanics and relativity, is fundamentally a domain of uncertainty, relationality, and dynamic change—not static, predictable objects. For Whitehead, Process Theology was not an effort to dismantle faith, but to rescue it by providing a concept of God that was rationally defensible and fully engaged with the dynamic, scientific universe.


    To resolve the apparent contradiction of a God who must be both stable (the source of order) and dynamic (the experiencer of the world), Process Theology asserts that God is a single, complex Actual Entity possessing a dual nature. First is God’s Primordial Nature. This is God’s unchanging mental pole: it is the realm of eternal possibilities and logical consistency. The Primordial Nature is the source of all novel ideas and ideal forms, luring every actual occasion toward its “best possible next step” through gentle persuasion, never coercion. Second is God’s Consequent Nature. This is God’s changing physical pole, which is constantly growing and evolving because it literally prehends (takes account of) every single actual occasion that perishes in the universe. This ensures that God is not merely static potential, but the perfect, ever-expanding memory of the entire cosmic process—a fellow-sufferer who truly understands the joy, pain, and history of the world.


    If the human being is ultimately a Society of Actual Occasions—a persistent pattern of fleeting experiences—then the notion of a single, non-material Substance Soul that detaches from the body at death is metaphysically incoherent in the Process system. The traditional idea of a static, eternal heaven is also rendered impossible, as existence itself is fundamentally dynamic change. So, where does human value and immortality reside? Process Theology answers that our genuine immortality lies not in a separate soul, but in God’s Consequent Nature. Every experience, feeling, and decision made by every actual occasion in the universe is objectively immortalized as part of God’s perfect, ever-expanding memory. Our influence and value are not lost; they are eternally preserved in the divine life, ensuring that nothing meaningful ever truly perishes.


    Beyond its structural coherence, Process Theology offers compelling answers to deep spiritual and ethical problems that often trouble traditional Christianity. It is crucial to note that these satisfying answers were not Whitehead’s deliberate goal; his primary aim was to replace the scientifically obsolete Aristotelian metaphysics. However, by successfully creating a dynamic metaphysics, Process Theology naturally resolves major issues. The most critical is the Problem of Evil: God is not omnipotent in the coercive sense and cannot force every Actual Occasion to choose good. Evil is a necessary byproduct of creation’s freedom when it resists God’s persuasive Lure toward greater harmony. This framework also allows believers to critique ethically ambiguous biblical passages. For instance, the Old Testament regulated practices like slavery (Exodus 21:2–7) because God had to work within the “hardness of heart” of human culture. This idea is explicitly affirmed by Jesus when discussing marriage and divorce, stating that the Mosaic Law permitted divorce “because of your hardness of heart” (Matthew 19:8)—implying that the Law was a cultural compromise, not God’s perfect, eternal will. The Lure in action is revealed when Jesus consistently and radically affirms the personhood of women and the marginalized. In an era when women and enslaved people were often treated as property, Jesus engaged them as theological discussion partners and moral agents, modeling the true ideal of relational equality. By affirming their dignity and personhood, Jesus embodied God’s gentle persuasion toward a higher ethical reality, showing that genuine revelation is always a developmental process that respects human freedom while constantly urging us toward justice.


    Ultimately, taking Process Theology seriously transforms one’s entire religious and moral life. This is where the concept of the Lure comes into play: God’s influence is never a command or a coercive force, but a gentle, ceaseless pull—an ever-present persuasion originating from the Primordial Nature that guides every actual occasion toward its most valuable and creative outcome. This is where originality and creativity become central to morality. Since every Actual Occasion makes a genuine choice about how to integrate its past experiences, the possibility for novelty is baked into the structure of reality. God does not demand obedience; He lures creation toward novel goodness. To live a life based on Process Theology is to recognize that we are co-creators with God in every moment. We are morally responsible for how we respond to that Lure, knowing that our actions are not lost but are eternally woven into the very being of God’s Consequent Nature. By choosing creative novelty, beauty, and justice, we are literally enriching the divine life, partnering with the fellow-sufferer who understands, and giving meaning to the fleeting nature of our own existence.

    📚 Recommended Reading on Process Theology

    Disclosure: Please note that some of the links below are Amazon Associate links, and I will earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through these links. This commission comes at no extra cost to you. I recommend these books because I believe they are truly helpful and valuable, not because of the small commissions I may receive. Your support helps keep this site running.

    If the ideas of a relational God and co-creation resonate with you, the following texts are highly recommended for delving deeper into this philosophical system:

  • 🌀 Why Everything You Know About Reality Might Be Backwards: Introducing Process Philosophy

    I love diving into different philosophical systems. I enjoy the geometric neatness of Plato’s Forms, the systematic organization of Aristotle’s goal-directed behavior (teleology), and the lively debates about consciousness, from Daniel Dennett’s functionalism to the mysteries of panpsychism.

    But I have to admit: Process Philosophy is the hardest system for me to truly get my mind around.

    It requires flipping your understanding of reality upside down. It challenges the bedrock assumption that most of philosophy—and our everyday intuition—is built upon. It argues that the universe is made not of static, fixed things, but of dynamic, momentary events and processes.

    Welcome to Process Philosophy, the philosophy of becoming. To understand reality, we must shift our focus from the noun to the verb.


    The Core Conflict: Substance vs. Process

    For thousands of years, the dominant idea in philosophy has been that the most real things are those that are fixed, enduring, and permanent. This is the bedrock of Substance Philosophy. Under this view, an entity (a person, a rock, a planet) has an underlying, unchanging substance or essence, and its changes (moving, aging, growing) are merely secondary or accidental.

    Process Philosophy stands in radical opposition. It asserts that change, flux, and activity are the primary, fundamental features of existence. Reality is fundamentally a current, not a container.

    This system was not created in a vacuum. The most comprehensive and influential systemization of this idea comes from the 20th-century British mathematician and philosopher, Alfred North Whitehead. He developed Process Philosophy as a direct response to revolutionary advances in contemporary science—specifically Relativity and the emergence of Quantum Mechanics. Whitehead recognized that the traditional philosophical view of reality as solid, inert substances could no longer account for a universe that science described as dynamic, relativistic, and ultimately composed of packets of energy and events. He deliberately sought to create a metaphysics that was harmonious with the scientific knowledge of his day.

    A far better analogy for existence isn’t a statue (a fixed, enduring form), but a river —a unified entity whose identity is maintained only through the constant, moment-by-moment flow of entirely new water.


    The Unit of Reality: Actual Occasions and Societies

    If reality isn’t made of fixed substances, what is it made of? Whitehead argued that the basic unit of existence is the Actual Occasion, or Actual Entity.

    An Actual Occasion is a momentary, intense, unified burst of experience or feeling that is an act of self-creation. It has a defined period of existence, achieves its specific purpose or “satisfaction,” and then immediately perishes, giving way to the next occasion.

    Think of your own consciousness: it’s not a single, continuous thing, but a rapid, integrated succession of events—a moment of perception, followed by a moment of decision, followed by a moment of feeling. Your mind’s reality is a constant flow of these vanishing occasions.

    Societies: How Enduring Objects Emerge

    If reality is just a flow of perishing moments, how do stable, enduring objects—like a rock, a planet, or a human being—exist for billions of years?

    Whitehead answers this question with the concept of a Society. A Society is a historical sequence or structure of Actual Occasions that are linked together because they all inherit a common defining characteristic or “form of definiteness” from the occasions that preceded them.

    In this view, even the most stable objects are not inert substances; they are enduring patterns of events. Reality, therefore, is a vast, hierarchical collection of Societies, all built from the fundamental flow of momentary Actual Occasions. This concept is Whitehead’s ultimate bridge between the flux of quantum physics and the stability we perceive in the macroscopic world.

    Beyond Subject and Object

    This event-based worldview dissolves the rigid split between the Subject (the isolated observer) and the Object (the external thing being observed).

    Every Actual Occasion is radically relational, meaning its very nature is defined by what it takes into itself from the rest of the universe. This act of integration is called Prehension.

    • An occasion prehends (or “grasps”) data, influences, and feelings from the entire set of past events in its environment.
    • The Subject (the moment of experience) is not separate from the Object (the reality it integrates); it is the way the objectified past comes together in a new, unique creation.

    The Big Names of Process Thought 🏛️

    While the ideas have ancient roots, the systematic framework of Process Philosophy is largely a 20th-century phenomenon driven by key figures:

    • Alfred North Whitehead (The Systematizer): Whitehead is the undisputed founder and system-builder. He created the formal metaphysics and unique vocabulary—including Actual Occasion and Prehension—which defined this tradition.
    • Charles Hartshorne (The Theologian): Following Whitehead, Hartshorne is the most important figure for the tradition’s intellectual reach. He systematically applied the logic of Process Philosophy to the concept of God, developing Process Theology.
    • Henri Bergson (The Philosopher of Duration): The French philosopher of time and change is a crucial precursor. His concept of Duration (durée)—time as a continuous, indivisible, creative flow—is one of the most powerful rejections of static, traditional substance philosophy.

    A Note on American Pragmatism

    You might encounter other names associated with this process tradition, such as the founders of American Pragmatism: John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, and William James.

    A few years ago I read one of Dewey’s books on education and was surprised to recently learn he is considered part of Process Philosophy! While the Pragmatists did not use Whitehead’s specific jargon, their philosophical core is deeply compatible with the process worldview:

    • Charles Sanders Peirce emphasized that knowledge and truth are processes—evolving products of ongoing communal inquiry, not static, final conclusions.
    • William James focused on experience as a stream of consciousness, an ever-changing flow where moments transition seamlessly, reinforcing the idea of reality as fundamentally dynamic.

    The Pragmatists’ focus on continuous change, evolution, and transactional experience firmly places them within the broad process tradition, even though their work developed independently of Whitehead’s specific metaphysical system.


    Process Philosophy vs. Process Theology

    Before we move on, it is essential to draw a clear line between the overarching philosophical system and its most famous application:

    • Process Philosophy: This is the general metaphysical system. It describes the fundamental nature of all reality—space, time, causality, and experience. It is a branch of philosophy focused on being as becoming.
    • Process Theology: This is a specific theological application of Process Philosophy’s insights to the nature of God. It imagines a God that is necessarily dynamic, relational, and involved in the world’s continuous process.

    Process Philosophy invites us to see the entire cosmos as a creative, interconnected, and genuinely open system. Reality is the constant, co-creative flow.


    🧠 A Final Thought Experiment: Imaging the World

    Before moving on, I encourage you to try a simple but profound thought experiment: Stop seeing the world as a collection of fixed objects, and try, just for a moment, to image it as a torrent of events.

    Look around you.

    Instead of seeing your phone as an inert, solid object, imagine it as a high-speed society—a stable, enduring pattern maintained by trillions of momentary, perishing actual occasions (atomic and electronic events) that constantly flow through it, binding it into its present form.

    Instead of seeing yourself as a fixed substance, recognize yourself as a vast, complex society of occasions, a dynamic flame whose identity is maintained only through the continuous, relational process of becoming—moment by moment, memory by memory.

    Whitehead’s system is difficult because it challenges our visual intuition. But if you can glimpse the world as a universe built entirely of occasions and societies, you’ve taken the essential step into the Process worldview.

    📚 Further Inquiry: Recommended Reading

    If the idea of a universe built on events rather than things has captured your curiosity, here are the books I recommend to begin your journey into Process Philosophy and its scientific foundations, ordered from the most accessible to the foundational texts.


    Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Some links below are affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you if you choose to make a purchase.

    1. Accessible Introductions & Overviews (Start Here)

    These books are highly recommended for clarity and immediate comprehension, ensuring a smooth entry into the core concepts.

    2. Guides to the System (Intermediate Steps)

    These books help the serious student navigate the complexity of the primary texts.

    3. The Foundational Texts: Whitehead’s Primary Works (The Deep Dive)

    These are the essential works directly from the system’s architect.

    • Science and the Modern World by Alfred North Whitehead
      • Focus (The Justification): The essential bridge text. Read this first to understand why Whitehead created process philosophy—it is his powerful critique of classical physics and his justification for a new, event-based system.
    • Process and Reality by Alfred North Whitehead
      • Focus (The System): Whitehead’s magnum opus. This is the complete, systematic exposition of his Process Philosophy (the Actual Occasion, Prehension, etc.). Only tackle this after reading one of the guides.

    In the next post, we will dive into the most fascinating application of this worldview: Process Theology. We will explore how a universe of events requires us to rethink God, turning the traditional view of an all-powerful controller into a luring or persuasive divine partner, and how this affects our everyday ethics.